Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.
~ Emma Lazarus, “The New Colossus,”
appears on the Statue of LibertyIt seems we as a nation we might have lost sight of this sentiment once again. As a nation of immigrants, you would think we would be acutely aware and sensitive to the importance of these words. But, too often the sentiment heard today is one of "we were here first" being spoken by a non-Native-American with a self-imposed authority and sense of ownership that trumps anyone coming after. Those types of people are trying very hard to slam those "golden doors" shut to new arrivals.
The latest attempt was the passing of legislation by the House of Representatives that would in essence consider all undocumented immigrants criminals. The law would require all employers to verify the immigration status of their employees and allow for the construction of a wall along much of the US-Mexico border. It appears that this will go the same way as California Proposition 187 did in 1994 and not become law.
Like Proposition 187, which attempted to deny public benefits to undocumented migrants, there are several problems with the House's legislation, which they are touting as a move to secure our borders from terrorists. One problem is based on the legislations implied racism and the other deals with practicality and the nation's underlying economy.
The first and most obvious problem is the narrow focus on the US southern border with Mexico and the people who have moved here from south of that border from Mexico and the various countries of both Central and South America. Why is the focus on this border, while very little to nothing is being proposed about creating a wall along our border with Canada? Our northern border is just as porous and is just as likely to allow "terrorist" into the US. This administration has focused its attention on Arab countries and through association Arab-Americans as the "most likely" terrorist threat. Studies have shown that many more Arabs enter the US through Canada than through Mexico. It should not be surprising for our northern border is less guarded and Canada hosts more than 50 terrorist groups and has a large Muslim population. But if we have learned anything from history, for example the US internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII, we should have learned that racial profiling does not work.
So, who exactly are we targeting with this increased militarization of our southern border? The migrant workers. Taking us to point two. Historically the US has used the US-Mexico border as a political football. In the US during times of economic slowdowns, like today, or under the rule of isolationist or imperialist administrations, like today, the border is used as a boogeyman. "Those illegal aliens are causing crime to rise, are using too many of our public resources, and are taking our jobs!" All of which only work to the benefit of politicians that succeed through manipulating the fears of the uneducated. For just as assuredly, when things are going well the US loosens its watch on the border in order to allow needed workers into the country to do the many jobs that the average American will not. [For more on this topic I would refer you to Timothy Dunn's outstanding book,
The Militarization of the U.S.-Mexico Border, 1978-1992.]
I grew up in the California Central Valley on a farm. I know from first-hand experience that the agribusiness of this country would be in even more peril than it currently is, if it was not for the hard-working migrant workers that harvest our crops each year. I also lived in San Diego while attending college and as a typical student I worked in the service industry, waiting tables, retail sales, etc. San Diego is a wealthy and popular tourist destination. Again without the migrant workers to clean the hotels, to wash the dishes, and manicure the landscaping at a low wage that supplies the foundation for the city's economy, San Diego's prosperity would quickly decline. It has been shown that any public services being used by these immigrants is greatly offset by the boost they bring to the US economy through their labor, consumption, and payment of taxes (even an undocumented immigrant will pay sales tax in California with each item purchased.)
The debate over these issues was embodied this weekend in Los Angeles through a protest march numbering as many as 500,000 people.
Los Angeles - A crowd estimated by police at more than 500,000 boisterously marched in Los Angeles on Saturday to protest federal legislation that would crack down on undocumented immigrants, penalize those who help them and build a security wall along the U.S.' southern border.
Spirited but peaceful marchers — ordinary immigrants alongside labor, religious and civil rights groups — stretched more than 20 blocks along Spring Street, Broadway and Main Street to City Hall, tooting kazoos, waving American flags and chanting, "Sí se puede!" (Yes we can!).
Attendance at the demonstration far surpassed the number of people who protested against the Vietnam War and Proposition 187, a 1994 state initiative that sought to deny public benefits to undocumented migrants but was struck down by the courts. Police said there were no arrests or injuries except for a few cases of exhaustion.
At a time when Congress prepares to crack down further on illegal immigration and self-appointed militias patrol the U.S. border to stem the flow, Saturday's rally represented a massive response, part of what immigration advocates are calling an unprecedented effort to mobilize immigrants and their supporters nationwide.
The next step will be taken by the Senate. The Senate's proposed legislation has some important differences with the House's.
On Monday, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to resume work on a comprehensive immigration reform proposal. The Senate committee's version includes elements of various bills, including a guest worker program and a path to legalization for the nation's 10 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants proposed by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.)
But, then there are others...
In addition, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) has introduced a bill that would strengthen border security, crack down on employers of illegal immigrants and increase the number of visas for workers.
Before any laws on this issue can be passed the Senate and the House will have to come to some sort of compromise. With the numbers of protestors speaking out this weekend and with mid-term elections on the horizon, it is likely a "softer" more humane and practical version of these bills will be agreed upon.